What Exactly Has Gone So Awry at Zipcar – Is the UK Vehicle-Sharing Market Finished?

The volunteer food project in Rotherhithe has distributed hundreds of prepared dishes weekly for two years to pensioners and vulnerable locals in southeast London. However, the group's plans face major disruption by the news that they will not have cars and vans on New Year’s Day.

The group depended on Zipcar, the car-sharing company that customers to access its fleet of vehicles via smartphone. It sent shockwaves across London when it declared it would cease its UK operations from 1 January.

It will mean many helpers will be unable to pick up supplies from the Felix Project, that collects surplus food from grocery stores, cafes and restaurants. Obvious alternatives are less convenient, more expensive, or do not offer the same convenient access.

“It’s going to be affected massively,” stated Vimal Pandya, the community kitchen’s founder. “My team and I are worried about the operational hurdle we will face. Many groups like ours are going to struggle.”

“Knowing the reality, everyone is concerned and thinking: ‘How are we going to carry on?”

A Major Blow for Urban Car-Sharing

These volunteers are part of over 500,000 people in London registered as car club members, who could be left without convenient access to vehicles, avoiding the burden and cost of ownership. The vast majority of those people were likely with Zipcar, which had a near-monopoly position in the city.

The planned closure, pending consultation with employees, is a big blow to hopes that vehicle clubs in cities could cut the need for private vehicle ownership. Yet, some analysts also suggested that Zipcar’s exit need not mean the demise for the concept in Britain.

The Promise of Shared Mobility

Car sharing is valued by city planners and environmentalists as a way of reducing the problems linked to vehicle ownership. Most cars sit as two-tonne dead weights on the side of the road for the vast majority of the time, using up space. They also require large carbon emissions to produce, and people who do not own cars tend to walk, cycle and take public transport more. That helps urban areas – easing congestion and pollution – and improves public health through more exercise.

Understanding the Decline

Zipcar was founded in 2000 before being bought by the US car rental group Avis Budget in 2013. Zipcar’s UK revenues barely registered compared with its owner's overall annual revenue, and a deficit that reached £11.7m in 2024 gave little incentive to continue.

Avis Budget has said the closure is part of a “wider restructuring across our international business, where we are taking deliberate steps to simplify processes, improve returns”.

Its latest financial reports noted revenues had fallen as drivers took less frequent, shorter trips. “This trend reflect the continuing effect of the economic squeeze, which continues to suppress demand for discretionary spending,” it said.

The Capital's Specific Challenges

Yet, several experts noted that London has specific problems that made it difficult for the company and its rivals to succeed.

  • Inconsistent Rules: With numerous local councils, car-club operators face a mosaic of different procedures and prices that complicate operations.
  • Congestion Charge: The closure comes as electric cars start paying London’s congestion charge, adding extra expenses.
  • Parking Permit Disparity: Locals in some boroughs pay just £63 for a annual electric car parking permit. A similar shared vehicle would pay over £1,100 per year, creating a major disincentive.

“We should literally be charged one-twentieth of a private parking cost,” said Robert Schopen of Co Wheels. “We’re taking cars off the street. We’re putting less polluting cars in their place.”

A European Example

Other European countries offer examples for London to follow. Germany introduced national shared mobility laws in 2017, providing a nationwide framework for parking, support and waivers. Now, the country has 5.4 shared cars per 10,000 people, while France has 2.1 and Belgium has 6.3. The UK trails at 0.7.

“The evidence shows is that shared mobility around the world, particularly on the continent, is growing,” commented Bharath Devanathan of Invers.

Devanathan said authorities should start to view vehicle clubs as a form of mass transit, and link it with train and bus stations. He added that one unnamed client was looking at entering the London market: “Operators will fill this gap.”

What Comes Next?

Other players can be split into two camps:

  1. Company-Owned Fleets: Which maintain their own cars. Examples Denmark’s GreenMobility, France’s Free2Move, and Germany’s Miles Mobility.
  2. Peer-to-Peer Services: Which allow users to hire out their own vehicles via an app – similar to Airbnb for cars. Examples Britain’s Hiyacar and the US’s Getaround and Turo.

Turo, a US-headquartered peer-to-peer platform, is assessing the UK gap. Rory Brimmer, its UK head, said there was a “big opportunity” to win more users. “There is a void that is going to need to be filled, because London still needs to move,” Brimmer said.

Yet, it could take some time for other players to build momentum. In the meantime, more people may feel forced to buy cars, and others across London will be without a convenient option.

For the volunteers in Rotherhithe, the next month will be a scramble to find a solution. The logistical challenge caused by Zipcar’s exit highlights the wider implications of its departure on vital services and the future of shared mobility in the UK.

Rhonda Cooley
Rhonda Cooley

Lena is a seasoned poker strategist with over a decade of experience in competitive online play and coaching.